All our users' most frequently asked questions about arc-flash risk
It is the result of an electrical short circuit conducted through the air. It is a violent release of thermal energy from an electrical source, which can cause serious or even fatal burns or injuries. On an electrical panel, the risks of an Arc Flash become a major concern starting at 220 volts AC.
The difference lies in the consequence related to the accident. In the case of electric shock, it refers to injuries caused by an electric current passing through the body, whereas electrocution refers to death resulting from an electric shock.
An Arc Flash can reach up to 18,000°C, which is about three times the heat of the sun’s surface.
The consequences of exposure to an Arc Flash are multiple :
An Arc Flash can occur in various environments, whether related to electrical installations or structures, starting from a nominal voltage of 220 Volts AC. Here are some examples :
It is crucial to follow safety and maintenance protocols and to wear appropriate PPE to protect users from the consequences of accidents and to minimize Arc Flash risks in these environments.
A Flash Arc can occur when electricity jumps across a gap between two conductors or between a conductor and a conductive surface (such as the ground or a metal enclosure). Several conditions can lead to an Arc Flash :
From 220 Volts AC.
One might think that in LV (Low Voltage), there is no exposure to Arc Flash, but that’s incorrect ! Even in ELV (Extra Low Voltage), the risk is still present.
There are several :
It defines the protection requirements – which means that it :
It is important not to forget the notion of responsibility – the employer must request this analysis from qualified individuals or organisations.
Only a recognized organisation or qualified individuals are authorized to carry out the risk analysis. The employer must request the analysis from these entities to define the protection requirements.
The incident energy related to an Arc Flash is expressed in cal/cm² (calories per square centimetre).
No, it is not possible to establish a link between ATPV (Arc Thermal Performance Value) and APC (Arc Protection Class) because they are two distinct test methods (not the same testing setups, nor the same measurement units in the results).
OPEN ARC Method : EC 61482-1-1
Determines the ATPV and ELIM ratings of PPE in cal/cm² (American principle).
This is the most representative testing method, closest to real-world conditions. It simulates thermal effects on the body, expressed in cal/cm².
Corresponds to a wide range of incident energy levels.
BOX TEST Method : IEC 61482-1-2
Defines two PPE protection classes, based on the electrical installation’s intensity (European principle) :
APC 1* : 4 kA for 0.5 s at 30 cm
APC 2* : 7 kA for 0.5 s at 30 cm
A test focused on current intensity/density, qualifying PPE into two categories – only up to 7 kA. Not suitable above 7 kA for electrical installations.
NB : It does not reflect actual thermal effects on the body. Applies only to electrical installations.
*Arc Protection Class
Yes, there is a link because both values are obtained using the same test method, but they are two different interpretations of the result.
→ The maximum thermal energy the PPE can withstand with a 50 % probability of second-degree burns. Expressed in cal/cm².
→ The maximum thermal energy the PPE can withstand with only a 1 % probability of second-degree burns. Expressed in cal/cm².
Follow the recommendations in the product-specific instructions for use.